- Back
- Who we are
- COP26
- Electricity explained
- A net zero future
-
Industry information
- Back
- Home
- Industry information
- Connections
- Balancing Services
-
Charging
- Back
- Industry information
- Charging
- Balancing Services Use of System (BSUoS) charges
- Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charges
- Assistance for Areas with High Electricity Distribution Costs (AAHEDC)
- Connection charges
- Charging guidance
- Charging policy developments
- Charging statements
- Submit a charging query
-
Codes
- Back
- Industry information
- Codes
- Connection and Use of System Code (CUSC)
- Grid Code (GC)
- System Operator Transmission Owner Code
- Security and Quality of Supply Standard (SQSS)
- Balancing Settlement Code (BSC)
- Digitalised Whole System Technical Code (WSTC)
- European Network Codes (ENC)
- Codes calendar
- Code changes: Beginner's Guide
- About the Codes Team
-
Industry Data and Reports
- Back
- Industry information
- Industry Data and Reports
- System Performance Reports
- Balancing services performance monitoring report
- Data finder and explorer
- Forecast volumes and costs
- GB Electricity System Operator Daily Reports
- System balancing reports
- Monthly transmission loss data (4l)
- System constraints
- Voltage costs
- Keeping the lights on throughout coronavirus
- Accelerated Loss of Mains applications
- Our consultation responses
- Our strategy
- Research & publications
ESO
Statement on Ofgem demand forecasting investigation
Our statement responding to Ofgem’s investigation into electricity demand forecasting in 2017.
We acknowledge Ofgem’s decision and have cooperated fully throughout their investigation.
Ofgem’s findings relate to a five-month period in 2017 immediately following the introduction of a new 7-day ahead demand forecasting process and an associated new incentive scheme. The investigation has not raised any concerns with our current electricity demand forecasts.
The actions taken four years ago were seeking to achieve more accurate forecasting. However, we acknowledge that, despite this intention, our processes at the time related to the new demand forecast process were not fully developed.
The issues raised in 2017 were fully resolved by December that year. Since then we have made significant investment in our demand forecasting capability, improving the tools and processes involved and trialling innovative new approaches. This has further improved the accuracy of our forecasts and addresses the issues raised in Ofgem’s investigation. We have therefore agreed to settle the case.
